Avoiding the “Not a Good Fit” Trap

May 31, 2024 Greg Olson

Avoiding the “Not a Good Fit” Trap

Avoiding the Not a Good Fit Trap: How to Save Time and Build Trust in Client-Vendor Relationships

Have you ever found yourself entangled in an endless back-and-forth with a vendor, only to be told weeks later that they’re not the right fit for your project? This frustrating experience can waste precious time and resources for both parties involved. As a client, recognizing the signs early can save you from this ordeal. As a vendor, being upfront and honest from the start can help you build stronger, more trusting relationships with your clients.

In this post, we’ll explore why this scenario occurs, how to identify it, and most importantly, how to prevent it from happening. By understanding the common pitfalls and implementing clear communication strategies, both clients and vendors can ensure more productive interactions. Let’s dive in and learn how to avoid the “not a good fit” trap for a more productive and trusting business environment.

Here are some possible explanations of why this condition exists:

  1. Cognitive Dissonance: Initially, the vendor might believe they can take on the project, but as they delve deeper, they realize it’s not a good fit. Admitting this to themselves and to you might cause discomfort, leading them to delay the inevitable decision.
  2. Optimism Bias: Vendors might have an initial optimism about their ability to handle new projects. This bias can cause them to overlook potential difficulties until they become more apparent over time.
  3. Workload Management: Sometimes vendors overcommit, not fully realizing the extent of their current workload. They may hope to find a way to fit your project in but eventually recognize they can’t manage it effectively. Early contacts with the company might not be as aware of later, deeper contacts within the company who ultimately make the call.
  4. Fear of Losing Business: Vendors might fear that turning down a project could harm their reputation or relationship with a potential client. They might delay saying no in hopes of finding a way to make it work or to avoid confrontation.
  5. Evaluation Process: In some cases, vendors need time to thoroughly evaluate the scope and requirements of a project. Initially, they might think it’s feasible, but deeper analysis reveals it isn’t. This process can take time, leading to delays in communicating their decision. Earlier contacts in the vendors are ill-equipped to properly evaluate projects. More experienced personnel may have said NO from the start but are not involved early on.
  6. Communication Issues: Internal miscommunications or disorganization within the vendor’s team can lead to delays. Different team members might have differing views on the project’s feasibility, leading to a protracted decision-making process.
  7. Strategic Reasons: Sometimes vendors might not want to reject a project outright due to strategic reasons, such as maintaining a potential future relationship or avoiding giving the impression that they are not capable of handling complex tasks.

How to Overcome Losing Time with Vendors who Don’t Fit?

  1. Addressing Cognitive Dissonance: Vendors should implement a thorough initial assessment to gauge project fit. Training staff to recognize and admit when a project isn’t a good fit can reduce discomfort and delays. Clients can help by clearly outlining project requirements and asking detailed questions early on.
  2. Mitigating Optimism Bias: Encourage a realistic evaluation of capabilities and potential challenges from the start. Vendors should adopt a more critical initial review process, and clients can request detailed project plans and timelines to gauge feasibility.
  3. Improving Workload Management: Vendors should maintain an updated workload chart and regularly review project commitments. Clients can ask about current workloads and ensure their project timeline aligns with the vendor’s capacity.
  4. Reducing Fear of Losing Business: Vendors should foster a culture where honest communication is valued over immediate gains. They can explain their reasons for declining a project, positioning it as an opportunity for future collaboration. Clients can appreciate and respect transparency, reinforcing a positive relationship.
  5. Streamlining the Evaluation Process: Vendors can develop a standardized project evaluation checklist to be used during initial client discussions. Ensuring experienced personnel are involved early can lead to quicker, more accurate assessments. Clients should provide comprehensive information upfront to facilitate this process.
  6. Enhancing Communication: Vendors should implement clear internal communication protocols and regular team updates. Clients can request progress updates and clarity on who the primary points of contact are to ensure alignment and avoid misunderstandings.
  7. Clarifying Strategic Reasons: Vendors should be clear about their strategic goals and communicate them to potential clients. This transparency helps set realistic expectations. Clients can ask direct questions about the vendor’s strategic fit for their project to gauge alignment early on.

The Way Forward

By addressing these common issues head-on, both vendors and clients can build stronger, more efficient relationships. Together we can avoid the “not a good fit” trap. Clear communication, realistic assessments, and strategic alignment are key to avoiding the “not a good fit” trap and cultivating a productive business environment.

Greg Olson

Strategic and creative chief marketer working with business leaders to clarify and communicate vision, advance innovative products and services, and build more capable, more profitable enterprises. Agency and client-side experiences in startups, small businesses, nonprofits, and publicly traded Fortune 100 enterprises. Especially adept at creating a clear path forward for products and services that are new to the world. I am passionate about creating a better world.
Thank you! Your subscription has been confirmed. You'll hear from us soon.